Lint report · stored run
Behaviorally Grounded User Profiles from the Wild for Personalized Alignment and Multi-Perspective Reasoning
0errors
0warnings
0info
20claims read
468numbers extracted
43references
How well we read this paper
2 observations
These are notes about our reading of the paper, not about the paper. They affect how much weight the findings below can carry.
Extraction warning 1
- ablation-labels-match-nothing None of the experiment ablation labels match any method component. Labels found: 'Open-Ended -> Random', 'w/o profiles (high-temperature sampling)', 'Open-Ended -> Raw Posts'. Either the components were extracted with different wording, or these labels are baselines rather than ablations — in which case RL004 has no evidence that anything was ablated.
Note 1
- compile-warning references: the reference list carries no entry numbers; citation keys are enumeration order [1]..[N], not labels printed in the paper, so a key may not match the [N] used in the body
Some checks could not run
- RL002 reported nothing, and it could not reach OpenAlex — so its silence here is not evidence that this paper is clean.
- RL003 reported nothing, and it could not reach OpenAlex — so its silence here is not evidence that this paper is clean.
Everything else on this page was computed from the paper itself and is unaffected. This is a limit of this run, not a finding about the paper.
Some checks did not apply to this paper
- RL005 did not apply to this paper — it links no repository we could read, so there was no released configuration to compare against. Its absence here says nothing about whether the paper and its code agree.
Compiler extraction log (1)
references: the reference list carries no entry numbers; citation keys are enumeration order [1]..[N], not labels printed in the paper, so a key may not match the [N] used in the body
No findings on this paper.
That is a result, not a failure. The compiler read the paper without errors, and no rule found something it could prove with evidence — this product would rather say nothing than say something vague.
Read the extraction notes above before taking this as a clean bill of health: they say which checks were working with incomplete information.
Rule notes (31)
RL001 funnel arithmetic: sentences_with_from=7 endpoint_pairs=3 claims_compared=0 emitted=0 [dropped: not-a-measurement=0]
RL001 funnel delta-column: structured_tables=8 with_exactly_one_delta_column=0 rows_checked=0 emitted=0
RL001 funnel cross-location: quant=468 prose=137 prose_with_metric=27 prose_with_dataset=70 prose_with_metric_and_dataset=23 distinct_buckets=3 emitted=0 [dropped: not-a-measurement=1 not-in-quote=9]
RL001 funnel identifier-drift: settings_checked=2 sections_stating_one_value=1 emitted=0
RL002 citation entailment: attempted 14 of 14 ranked cited claims (37 in-text markers from 43 bibliography entries); 1 cited works could not be identified, 8 had no retrievable text, 0 model quotes failed verbatim verification, 0 were topically unrelated to the retrieved text.
RL002 candidate ranking (why the top 14 were chosen): [33] [introduction, names an artefact (OPPU), title/sentence overlap near zero]; [37] [introduction, title/sentence overlap near zero, no DOI/arXiv id]; [32] [introduction, title/sentence overlap near zero, no DOI/arXiv id]; [31] [introduction, title/sentence overlap near zero, no DOI/arXiv id]; [24] [introduction, title/sentence overlap near zero, no DOI/arXiv id]; [40] [introduction, title/sentence overlap near zero, no DOI/arXiv id]; [30] [introduction, title/sentence overlap near zero]; [10] [introduction, title/sentence overlap near zero]
RL002 label distribution over 5 classified citations: SUPPORTED=5
RL002 base-rate self-check: not tripped (0/5 = 0% NOT_SUPPORTED, threshold 40%).
RL002 attribution check (case B): 3 candidates name an artefact, 3 of them made the top-N and were checked against their cited source
RL002: 4 citations skipped because the sentence reports this paper's own results (the citation there is a comparison pointer, not evidence for the sentence)
RL002: 2 markers skipped because the claim is jointly attributed to several works
RL002: 4 enumerated-citation sentences skipped (they cite >=3 works, so the claim is about the set and cannot be refuted by any single cited work)
RL002: 1 cited works unresolvable (first 3: [{"key": "[27]", "title": "Mauve: Measuring the gap between neural text and human text using divergence frontiers", "why": "no work record matched the bibliography title"}])
RL003: 3 queries -> 116 unique works (arXiv search 50, category listings 0, scholarly graph 66 [crossref 66], 0 graph works matched to an arXiv id); source errors during retrieval: arXiv 0, graph 0
RL003: parsed the reference list of 7/12 comparable papers (5 unreadable) — that is the PeerUsage denominator
RL003: enriched 0 of 0 candidates with their own abstract (0 unavailable, 0 over budget); 0 dropped as published after this paper
RL003: scholarly graph for this run = crossref
RL003 funnel (342 candidates): cited_only_from_related_work -74, peer_usage_below_quorum -76, survey_or_artifact -39, title_names_no_method -153 || kept: citation_context_unknown +38 || survived-cheap-gates 0 -> with-abstract 0 -> comparable 0 -> above-threshold-0.65 0
RL003: 0 comparable candidates all scored below 0.65 — nothing to report for this paper
RL004 funnel: components=10 contribution_backed=3 candidates=1 ablations_found=7 matched_by_ablation=1 unmatched=0 experiments=13
RL004 component M1 'Behaviorally Grounded Profile Extraction': covered (filtered earlier)
RL004 component M2 'LLM Attributes Extraction': covered (filtered earlier)
RL004 component M3 'Removing duplicates, conflicts & Summarise': covered (filtered earlier)
RL004 component M4 'Personalized Alignment via SFT': covered (candidate)
RL004 component M5 'Test-time Multi-Perspective Reasoning': covered (filtered earlier)
RL004 component M6 'Mixture of Perspectives': covered (filtered earlier)
RL004 component M7 'Aggregator': covered (filtered earlier)
RL004 component M8 'Full-parameter SFT': excluded:not-a-claimed-contribution
RL004 component M9 'QLoRA': excluded:not-a-claimed-contribution
RL004 component M10 'GPT-OSS-120B': excluded:not-a-claimed-contribution
RL004 funnel: ranked=0 emitted=0 suppressed_by_cap=0 dropped_unverified_quote=0
Reading the report as data
This page is a rendering of the report the pipeline wrote. The JSON below
is the stored artefact, unedited — the same document
research-lint --format json produces.
loading…